Thursday, September 01, 2005

Thinx 22: Why not consider ID (Intelligent Design)? Because ...

‘Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic.’

-- Scott Todd, Kansas State University immunologist, correspondence to Nature 410(6752):423, 30 Sept. 1999.


But no one asks the question, "Does science have to be naturalistic?"

And no one asks the deeper question, "What does 'scientific' mean?"
at

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous8:28 am

    Hello Bruce,
    Do you remember me from Riverton Baptist back in the early 90s? Drop me a line at matthew@perthonline.net

    Matthew Lock

    ReplyDelete