‘Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic.’
-- Scott Todd, Kansas State University immunologist, correspondence to Nature 410(6752):423, 30 Sept. 1999.
But no one asks the question, "Does science have to be naturalistic?"
And no one asks the deeper question, "What does 'scientific' mean?"
1 comment:
Hello Bruce,
Do you remember me from Riverton Baptist back in the early 90s? Drop me a line at matthew@perthonline.net
Matthew Lock
Post a Comment